Sunday, 2 August 2015

What is the Jenkins and Maven difference

Maven-build tool Jenkins-CI tool. you can read more about Jenkins here:- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenkins_(software) it's stackoverflow difference here:- --------------------------------------------------------------- Maven is building tool/environment. Jenkins, on the other hand, is a CI (continuous integration) tool. Maven is more like a replacement for Ant. It gives basic support for build and version control, JUnit tests, etc... you define what you want to do in a pom.xml file. Jenkins itself doen't support build / version control or JUnit, but rather it calls the pom.xml file you have defined in your project. Jenkins gives you the power to decide when to call the pom.xml file, how to call, and what you want to do with the outcome. This is a powerful idea. For example, you can ask Jenkins to trigger a build or run through all JUnit tests whenever new code is committed and then, if the unit tests are passed, deploy on a target machine. This is the basic idea of auto deployment or AKA continuous integration. CI for short if you like. ---------------------------------------------------- Ref:- http://javarevisited.blogspot.in/2015/01/difference-between-maven-ant-jenkins-and-hudson.html http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10834262/jenkins-and-maven-difference
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. Matt Calder24 December 2025 at 02:25

    This is a solid and practical explanation of a distinction that often confuses people when they first step into CI and build automation. Framing Maven as the build definition and Jenkins as the orchestrator really helps clarify their roles. Maven focuses on how the project is built, tested, and packaged, while Jenkins focuses on when and under what conditions those steps should run.

    I also like that you highlight Jenkins as a coordinator rather than a replacement. That mental model scales well once teams add more steps like static analysis, automated testing, and deployment gates. In real world pipelines, the value comes from how these tools work together, not from treating them as competitors.

    As pipelines grow, especially with more automated tests and environments, having visibility into what was tested, when, and with what outcome becomes critical. That is where structured test management fits naturally alongside CI tools. For teams looking to bring more clarity to their Jenkins driven workflows, Tuskr test management software can help keep test cases, runs, and results aligned with automated builds and releases.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)