The contract of the Comparable interface allows for non-consistent behaviour:
It is strongly recommended (though not required) that natural orderings be consistent with equals.
So in theory, it is possible that a class in the JDK had a
compareTo
not consistent with equals
. One good example is BigDecimal.
Below is a contrived example of a comparator that is not consistent with equals (it basically says that all strings are equal).
Output:
size: 1
content: {a=b}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<String, String> brokenMap = new TreeMap<String, String> (new Comparator<String>() {
@Override
public int compare(String o1, String o2) {
return 0;
}
});
brokenMap.put("a", "a");
brokenMap.put("b", "b");
System.out.println("size: " + brokenMap.size());
System.out.println("content: " + brokenMap);
}
but see now if you store same entry in hashmap
it will store because a.equals(b) always false. so it will store both a and b.
where as in TreeMap it wont thats the problem. because compare b/w a and b is 0...so
1 will broke
single value will store
No comments:
Post a Comment